Office to Residential Conversion Is Changing Appraisals in Ways People Don’t Expect

Office to residential conversion has become a regular part of real estate conversations, and it is not limited to developers and city planners anymore. Buyers run into it when a lender asks for extra documentation, sellers hear it when an agent tries to explain competing inventory, and homeowners notice it when a nearby office building starts showing up in the news as a “future residential project” even though it still looks like an office every time you drive by. That kind of shift does not stay in the background, because once a property’s future use starts feeling uncertain, the way value gets supported can change.

A big driver is that cities are actively trying to make conversions easier in places where office demand has not bounced back the way people once assumed it would. New York City’s City of Yes for Housing Opportunity initiative explicitly expands and broadens non residential to residential conversions citywide, including moving up the eligibility date to allow more buildings to qualify for conversion rules (NYC Department of City Planning: https://www.nyc.gov/content/planning/pages/our-work/plans/citywide/city-of-yes-housing-opportunity). New York State also created a tax incentive aimed at commercial conversions that include affordable housing, which is a pretty direct signal that policymakers want more of these projects to pencil out (NYC HPD summary of RPTL 467 m: https://www.nyc.gov/site/hpd/services-and-information/tax-incentives-467-m.page).

None of that means every office building can become housing, and it definitely does not mean values automatically go up. It means appraisals are increasingly being asked to deal with a property that sits in an awkward in between space, where current use, future use, and buyer expectations do not line up neatly.

Office to Residential Conversion Is Not as Simple as It Sounds

A common assumption is that an empty office building should be an easy candidate for apartments, but the physical layout of many older office buildings fights the idea. Some floor plates are too deep to bring in enough natural light for residential units without major redesign. Plumbing and mechanical systems can be expensive to rework. Window spacing and structural grids can limit unit layouts in ways that do not show up on a glossy redevelopment rendering. The Urban Land Institute shared a practical takeaway from a Gensler leader on this point, noting that only a portion of the office buildings they analyze are truly viable for office to residential conversion, because so many simply do not fit from a design and economics perspective (Urban Land Institute, Nov 2024: https://urbanland.uli.org/making-office-to-residential-conversions-pencil-out).

That physical reality is part of why appraisals can get tricky. A building might be discussed publicly as a conversion candidate, but “candidate” can mean anything from a serious project with financing and approvals to a concept that looks good in a press release and nowhere else. The gap between those two things is often where expectations drift, and it is also where deals start to wobble if nobody slows down and clarifies what is real.

What Appraisers Are Seeing When Conversions Enter the Picture

Appraisers are seeing more assignments where the story around the property includes conversion potential, even if the building is still leased as office today. One common scenario involves an older office building that has tenants, but the leases are shorter, renewal risk is higher, and the buyer is underwriting the purchase based on a future residential plan that is still in progress. The contract price can reflect optimism about what the property will become, while the current income stream looks only modest, and the appraisal has to separate what is supported right now from what is still speculative without pretending that speculation is not influencing buyer behavior.

A second scenario shows up on the residential side, where a buyer is purchasing a nearby condo or townhouse and asks whether a proposed office to residential conversion next door is going to help or hurt value. Sometimes the concern is about practical living issues like construction duration, noise, staging areas, parking disruption, and what the street feels like during the build out, and those concerns are not irrational even when there is no clean way to translate them into a numeric adjustment. Appraisals in that situation usually lean on market evidence first, because that is the job, but they also need to acknowledge what informed buyers are paying attention to because buyer perception is part of market behavior, and ignoring it can make the report feel disconnected from how people actually make decisions.

A third scenario involves financing questions that arrive before the appraisal is even ordered. Lenders may ask whether the property’s highest and best use is still office, whether remaining economic life assumptions are reasonable, or whether the building is moving toward a transitional phase where long term office demand is uncertain. The questions tend to get more pointed when public policy is pushing conversions forward, because policy changes can alter what is legally possible and financially feasible faster than the comparable sales data can reflect.

It helps to say plainly that this is not about appraisers being mysterious or making things complicated for the sake of it. Conversions introduce more moving parts, and more moving parts require clearer documentation and clearer reasoning.

Highest and Best Use Gets Messier When Use Is in Transition

Highest and best use can sound academic, but in practice it is a simple idea: what use is legally allowed, physically possible, financially feasible, and produces the best outcome based on market behavior. Office to residential conversion puts pressure on that analysis because a building can be legally allowed to operate as office today while also becoming legally eligible for residential conversion due to zoning reform, and at the same time it can be physically difficult to convert and financially questionable unless incentives, tax treatment, or pricing resets make it workable.

New York City’s City of Yes framework is a good example of how policy can expand conversion eligibility in a way that changes the conversation around older building stock (NYC Department of City Planning: https://www.nyc.gov/content/planning/pages/our-work/plans/citywide/city-of-yes-housing-opportunity). New York State’s 467 m incentive is another example, because it directly ties tax benefits to conversions that include affordable housing components, which changes feasibility for some projects that would not work otherwise (NYC HPD summary of RPTL 467 m: https://www.nyc.gov/site/hpd/services-and-information/tax-incentives-467-m.page).

Office fundamentals also matter. A national office market snapshot can swing by quarter and by city, but broader research still influences lender and investor expectations. CBRE reported that U.S. office vacancy posted a year over year decline in Q3 2025 and highlighted that prime buildings outperformed, which lines up with what many market participants have been saying about quality bifurcation in office space (CBRE Q3 2025 U.S. Office Figures: https://www.cbre.com/insights/figures/q3-2025-us-office-figures). That does not contradict conversion activity. It reinforces the idea that older, outdated stock is where the pressure concentrates, and that pressure is exactly what fuels more office to residential conversion proposals.

A Practical Takeaway That Helps in Real Transactions

When office to residential conversion is part of the background of a deal, the most practical step is to stop relying on general buzz and start collecting specific, verifiable facts early. That means pulling the zoning status directly from the city, confirming whether permits have been issued, asking whether financing is secured, and getting a realistic timeline rather than a hopeful one, because an appraisal can only treat future use as more than speculation when the legal and practical path is real and documentable.

Agents and buyers can also reduce appraisal friction by making sure the contract package includes relevant documentation when conversion talk is influencing the price. Public approvals, recorded zoning changes, filed plans, and formal incentive program participation are the kinds of things that can be referenced and evaluated. A headline, a rumor, or a “they’re talking about it” statement usually cannot, and that is where frustration starts because people feel like everyone is discussing the same project but not the same level of certainty.

That approach is useful even if a property is not the one being converted. Nearby residential deals can benefit from clear documentation too, because it helps explain whether the neighborhood is facing a short term construction disruption, a long term land use change, or a proposal that may never materialize.

Professional appraisal services fit naturally into this topic because office to residential conversion creates situations where value depends on careful separation of what is supported today and what is still emerging. If a property you are buying, selling, or refinancing is affected by a nearby conversion project or a conversion plan tied to the subject itself, Gulf Stream Residential Appraisal can provide a report that addresses those specifics clearly instead of glossing over them. If you want to talk it through, the simplest next step is to request a quote or schedule a consultation.

Next
Next

Why Buyers Are Fleeing to “Refuge Markets,” and Why Appraisers Should Pay Attention